Saturday, 29 August 2015

The Unpleasant Comments Of Aviation Enthusiasts About Shoreham Air Crash Deaths

It has been revealed that the Red Arrows decline to perform at Shoreham Air Show because it is considered "too dangerous".
Daily Mirror Photo Of Shoreham Air Crash
In response to Sky News article Air Shows To Be "Significantly Restricted" (see below) the following comments were made by aviation enthusiasts using anonymous names who differ greatly to the general public who wished to visit Shoreham for a safe day out only with no particular expectations from the pilots / aircraft. Note that the comments below are all concerned with the continuation of their aviation interest only and NOT PUBLIC SAFETY - surely this is an offence like protecting dangerous driving ? 

Linked comments made to Sky News article, click Sky News Article

1) Comment by Cottonweaver
 I wonder if;-
 a), the media el al will create such a clamour when the next motorway pile up happens....

 b) if as a result all roads, including motorways, will be restricted to a maximum of 30 mph... indefinitely.
And Sky news have trawled back to the Farnborough air display accident of 1952 and given details of incidents and casualties.
To keep a true perspective and in the interests of fairness and safety would it not be appropriate to also give details of the total road traffic accident casuality figures in the same timeframe as a comparison.

Pilot Andy Hill Whose Plane Killed 11 Innocent People
2) Comment by GlobalHawk
I was waiting for this knee jerk reaction from the CAA, bowing to intense Govt pressure based on largely sensationalist and inaccurate media reporting. Until the cause is identified, which at the moment it isn't, ground all Hunters and Gnats. Hundreds of displays take place every year in the UK in front of 100's of thousands of spectators with this type of historical aircraft. The UK already has stringent regulations in place for air displays and this was a tragic accident. Some of these supposed experts the press are speaking to don't have a clue when it comes to the facts behind this and their level of expertise

3).Comment by arharvey72

Complete knee jerk. Nothing is 100% safe.

4) Comments by dewing5

The Plane Before It Crashed On A Heavily Populated Narrow Strip Of Road
Also these restrictions are going to spoil airshows for everyone else. Everyone is looking for someone to blame, what is wrong with this country, it was an accident. Could have been a lorry that ploughed into everyone would you call to ban lorries.  They keep in about the red arrows, they were never supposed to be there in the first place, shore ham wasn't on their list of airshows

5) Comment by Peter2207

This is just a knee jerk reaction following a tragic accident. I don't see them shutting Gatwick and Heathrow which have hundreds of planes every day flying over motorways on the way into land. Surely there is more chance of a 747 having engine failure and crashing onto the motorway than there was of Saturday's accident at Shoreham?

6) Comment by Elephant Man
 Ridiculous, I was waiting for this typical knee jerk reaction we frequently see in this country. Why don't we stop planes flying that will make us all safer!

The world is not a sterile environment and unfortunately accidents do happen. This is tragic but the reality is that the people who died were at a much greater risk on their car journey than they ever were of having a fighter jet land on them and we don't limit cars to 10mph do we!

------ End of extracted aviation enthusiast comments

We condemn the the above comments made by aviation enthusiasts we would like to simply remember the innocent victims of the Shoreham air crash announced so far and call for public safeyy to be the paramount consideration of all air shows and NOT the hobbies of a select few.

Sky News article with unpleasant comments from aviation enthusiasts

Red Arrows Deemed Shoreham Air Show Too Dangerous For Display

Shoreham IsToo Dangerous !! Daily Express Reports RED ARROWS REFUSAL to perform at Shoreham 

Monday, 24 August 2015

Journalist Nicholas Hair infers public expectations are cause of Shoreham Air Show deaths !

Pilot Andy Hill Whose Plane Killed Innocent People
The Shoreham air crash disaster has resulted in the loss of eleven innocent lives. Unbelievably, transport journalist Nicholas Hair has inferred that the public are to BLAME for the Shoreham crash !

In contrast to the inference of Nicholas Hair on Radio 5 live, the general public DO NOT demand that vintage aircraft MUST be flown beyond their safe limits. The general public DO NOT want ANY DISASTERS to happen at a public air show - they want a safe day out. We think Mr Hair's outburst on Radio 5 Live illustrates the arrogant attitudes within the aviation community.   

Road Side Tributes To The Innocent Shoreham Victims
Speaking on Radio 5 Live Transport Journalist Nicholas Hair said "Public shouldn't expect manoeuvres from old planes". People expect to see "barrel rolls and loop the loops" at air shows despite the age of some of the planes involved, says aviation journalist Nicholas Hair. He said although ex-military aircraft do have a longer shelf-life than commercial aircraft, the public should be "a bit more sensitive" to the age of "museum pieces" participating in air shows. Speaking about the safety of air shows, Mr Hair said he would "hate" for shows which raise "raise thousands of pounds for charities every year" to be stopped because of a "freak accident."The final death toll of the accident is still to be confirmed. 

Twitter tweets from journalist Nicholas Hair 
Twitter photo of Nicholas Hair

  Aug 23  
Andddddddd relax. Thanks to Breakfast and Five Live for having me this morning - I hope that we have dispelled plenty of speculation.

Come on, Pilot Hills. Keep fighting.

With the Airshow cancelled today, please consider donating to so that they can continue to do their excellent work

The First Innocent Victims Reported
BBC reports that first Shoreham victims named are Matt Jones (left) and Matthew Grimstone (right).  In a tribute, Sue and Phil Grimstone said: "The family are in total shock at losing our dearest son Matthew so tragically at 23 years old. "He was the kindest person you could ever meet, with a great wit. "In his 23 years, we can honestly say he never lost his temper." Speaking on Facebook, Mr Jones' sister Becky said: "We are devastated to say Matt Jones was one of the fatalities."

A further 14 people were injured, four of whom were taken to hospital, when the jet crashed on the A27 at 13:20 BST.

Journalist NIcholas Hair Blames Public

Eye-Witness Accounts Of Crash

Tributes Paid to Victims

Victims Mother Calls For All Air Shows To Take Place Over Sea

Friday, 21 August 2015

Simon Abney-Hastings - Long Live The Rightful King of England

Did you know that an Australian citizen is purported to be the rightful King of England ? Simon Abney-Hastings is apparently the King of England following the sad death of his father Michael in 2012.

King Simon Abney-Hastings ?
The Telegraph reports that "Simon Abney-Hastings, the 15th Earl of Loudon, is a 37-year-old bachelor who works for a fabrics company in the town of Wangaratta, about 140 miles from Melbourne. He said he was aware he was "possibly" the rightful king but would prefer not to take the throne."

In 2004 a Channel 4 documentary suggested that King Edward IV was conceived illegitamately and the crown should have passed to the Plantagenet line which eventually ends at the Abney-Hastings family in Australia.

What has this to do with Havering you might ask ? Well the Royal Liberty of Havering charter of 1465 was issued by King Edward IV.  As King Edward IV is not regarded as a true king due to his illegitamacy then the 1465 Charter is not valid.  The local royalist community are always keen to quote the "legal freedoms" of a royal liberty charter as a political and cultural slight against parliament but this conduct can be potentially declared formerly illegal and hence a potential criminal offense. 

Simon Abney-Hastings (from wikipedia)

Simon Abney-Hastings claim to the throne of England ?

Michael Abney Hastings Sadly Dies

The Jerilderie Man Who Could Have Been King

Twitter Account Of Righful King Of England

Saturday, 15 August 2015

Andrew Rosindell MP - An Advocate of Everbody Else Joining The Armed Services

Rosindell's "Inspiration" Advising Margaret Thatcher
Andrew Rosindell MP prides himself on his patriotism but needless to say he has NO UNIFORMED NATIONAL SERVICE OF HIS OWN like many flag-wavers in the Romford Conservative Party he talks a lot about national service but there was never any real prospect of HIM (or any of the big mouths in Romford Conservative Party circles) ever joining up themselves.  However they think it is of the HIGHEST IMPORTANCE that OTHER PEOPLE and their children DO JOIN.

The opportunities that Mr Rosindell has taken to encourage OTHER PEOPLE'S children to join the armed services and police must number in the tens of thousands and Mr Rosindell's political fortunes are linked to it.. Mr Rosindell is the "king of subsidised jaunts" as journalist Simon Heffer described him (reference 1) his lack of national service doesn't stop him arranging endless photo opoortunities with armed services all over the world at the TAX PAYERS EXPENSE.

Lord Archer Was Convicted of Perjury
Perhaps he thinks that flag-waving and encouraging EVERBODY ELSE to join up is one way to sample the good life. Mr Rosindell held a recent "celebration" of his 25 years of "public service" with guest of honour Lord Jeffrey Archer, a friend of Mr Rosindell fo 30 years and "the man who inspired him to become an MP." (3).   There aren't many people in politics today who would call the convicted Lord Jeffrey Archer an "inspiration" perhaps that tells us all we need to know about Andrew Rosindell MP.

 1. Simon Heffer On Rosindell - The "King of Subsidised Jaunts"   

2. Rosindell's "Celebration" of 25 Years "Public Service"

3. Lord Archer Convicted For Perjury